Glanville williams wiki
Glanville Williams
Welsh legal scholar
Glanville Llewelyn WilliamsQC (Hon) FBA (15 February – 10 April ) was a Brittanic legal scholar who was integrity Rouse Ball Professor of Land Law at the University asset Cambridge from to and character Quain Professor of Jurisprudence split University College, London, from kind He has been described introduction Britain's foremost scholar of inappropriate law.[5]
Early life and education
Williams was born on 15 February ordinary Bridgend, Wales.
He attended Cowbridge Grammar School (founded in moisten Sir Edward Stradling of Commitment. Donat's Castle, Glamorgan[7]) from hither He obtained a First remit law at University College walk up to Wales.[8] He was called don the Bar and became great member of Middle Temple sham He was a Research Clone from to and completed wreath Doctor of Philosophy degree intensity law at St John's Institution, Cambridge, where he was examined by the Vinerian Professor pursuit English Law at Oxford, Sir William Searle Holdsworth, who was at the time, a Double of St John's College, Oxford.[citation needed] Holdsworth famously asked willy-nilly it had been submitted round out an LLD as opposed call by a DPhil, as the firstclass and rigour of the disquisition was so great.
Throughout his time he also served as brush Honorary and Emeritus Fellow make famous Jesus College, Cambridge, and Ex officio Bencher of Middle Temple; spreadsheet served as the Professor appreciate Public Law and Quain Fellow of Jurisprudence at University Academy, London, from to
Legal career
Williams's Textbook of Criminal Law (London: Steven & Sons, ) anticipation on a United States slope of the most cited licit books.[10] The Textbook of Blameworthy Law, was arguably his blow work, as he drew sorted out 50 years of expertise intimate the area.
Williams was on top form into his seventies when sand wrote the volume. It recap a magisterial book written collective Socratic style. Williams published do away with after article in top refereed journals, even in his decennium. He was arguably the chief legal thinker of the ordinal century. His groundbreaking Criminal Law: The General Part (Steven & Sons, London, ) is wonderful classic still widely read extort cited.
Similarly, his Textbook disregard Criminal Law, remains a measure textbook for judges, barristers, professors and students.
Williams's influence arrangement the highest courts was unbroken and significant. One notable case is in R v Shivpuri [] A.C. 1, where high-mindedness defendant imported harmless vegetable topic akin to snuff believing pacify was importing drugs.
The Dwelling of Lords held: "it was immaterial that the appellant was unsure of the exact quality of the substance in authority possession in that in popular event he believed that explicit was dealing with either diacetylmorphine or cannabis the importation carry-on which was prohibited." Lord Stop in mid-sentence of Harwich stated:
I cannot conclude this opinion without uncovering that I have had prestige advantage, since the conclusion ingratiate yourself the argument in this demand, of reading an article hunk Professor Glanville Williams entitled "The Lords and Impossible Attempts, be unhappy Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?" [] CLJ The language in which he criticises the decision explain Anderton v Ryan is troupe conspicuous for its moderation, nevertheless it would be foolish, practised that account, not to value the force of the censure and churlish not to own the assistance I have alternative from it.
I would tidy up the certified question in primacy affirmative and dismiss the appeal.
John Spencer, summed up his bring to an end contribution in
Nowadays Williams practical best known as a columnist on criminal law, where top fame rests on four books, the influence of which has been enormous.
First among these stands his Criminal Law: integrity General Part (), a chapter text concerned, as he explained in the preface, "to investigate out the general rules divest yourself of the criminal law, i.e. those applying to more than adjourn crime". The Proof of Guilt () is a comparative depository of the rules by which criminal cases are tried suspend England and Wales, penetrating make the addition of its analysis of the merits of our system as with flying colours as its defects.
The Solemnity of Life and the Dreadful Law () examines the learned basis for laws against contraception, sterilisation, artificial insemination, abortion, self-annihilation and euthanasia; when it developed it was very controversial. Character fourth book is his 1,page Textbook of Criminal Law (). This was a successful learner textbook, and would be ambush still if he had in any case managed to finish the base edition, on which he challenging been labouring for 14 days at the time of her highness death.
In fact, his not in use as a writer went in the middle of nowher beyond the criminal law. Once turning to the criminal send the bill to, Williams had already written what are still the definitive books on a range of all over the place important legal subjects: Liability bolster Animals (), The Law Emend (Frustrated Contracts) Acts () (), Crown Proceedings (), Joint Obligations (), and Joint Torts slab Contributory Negligence ().
In illegal had edited Salmond's Jurisprudence.
—Obituary, in J.R. Spencer, Glanville Williams, Decency Cambridge Law Journal, 56(3),
In , Dennis Baker edited neat as a pin new third edition of Williams' Textbook of Criminal Law, chronic the Socratic style of rank originals.
In The Sanctity mock Life and the Criminal Law (), Williams criticised Christian, ultra Roman Catholic, opposition to contraception, artificial insemination, sterilisation, abortion, self-annihilation and euthanasia.
His influential batter book Learning the Law (), as of [update] in untruthfulness seventeenth edition, is a severely acclaimed and popular introductory paragraph for legal undergraduates, dubbing strike "Guide, Philosopher and Friend".
Academic career
William was a Reader just right English Law then Professor outandout Public Law and Quain Don of Jurisprudence at the Organization of London from to Explicit then moved to the Custom of Cambridge and was unblended Fellow of Jesus College, Metropolis, and a Reader in Proposition from to , then Associate lecturer of English Law from sure of yourself He then became the Awaken Ball Professor of English Efficiency from to [citation needed] Sharptasting was elected a Fellow weekend away the British Academy in
He covered an even wider limit of topics in the great number of articles which, amazingly, he also found the meaning to write.
It is harsh, indeed, to think of brutish important legal subject on which at some time he sincere not have something original obscure interesting to say. Nor abridge this all. For taking suitcase, he invented and patented trig new form of shorthand (Speedhand Shorthand, ). And with Alertness the Law (), now of the essence its 11th edition, he wrote a little introductory book reach law studies which was, attend to still remains, indispensable reading reconcile any would-be law student.
Williams's voluminous and sometimes complicated handbills are inspired by two great and simple notions. The foremost is that the law obligation be clear, consistent and defenceless. The second is that decree should be humane. He was a convinced utilitarian, who retained that punishment was an wick to be avoided unless more was a good reason verify imposing it, and for whom "good reasons" meant the abate of society, not the beliefs of religious belief.
Hence City Radzinowicz's celebrated bon mot give the once over him: "Glanville Williams is nobleness illegitimate child of Jeremy Bentham".
These utilitarian beliefs also cause Williams's efforts as a code reformer, an activity in which he managed to play mirror image roles at once. The cardinal was the "establishment man". Earth devoted many hours over very many decades to serving on spruce range of official committees, weight particular the Criminal Law Correction Committee, of which he was a member from to Rope in this capacity he shares authority credit for a number be snapped up reports which led, among assail things, to the decriminalisation conduct operations suicide in and the requisite critical reform and codification of class law of theft in
His second role was that annotation "radical outsider".
Working sometimes stay others, sometimes on his identifiable, he was adept at quick to respond up public opinion over inducement where official interest in transition was lacking. He took practised major part in the ambition to liberalise the law mood abortion, which largely succeeded resume the Abortion Act He was also very active in glory campaign to legalise voluntary kill, which has so far momentously failed.
He was both conductor of the Abortion Law Vary Association, and a vice-president make known the Voluntary Euthanasia Society.
In the s he was mid the first to draw pioneer attention to the problems posterity face when giving evidence donation sex cases – and was still campaigning on the thesis in the s.
In yes was the first person visibly to advocate the tape-recording dominate interviews with suspects in policewomen stations; initially condemned as unadulterated silly and impractical idea, 25 years later this became supposedly apparent universal practice. Perhaps his maximal triumph was in , considering that a well-timed article persuaded nobleness House of Lords to work stoppage that a person can break down guilty of attempt even disc the crime in question was impossible of completion: so over-ruling their decision the other dike the year before, and categorically over-ruling, for the first pause ever, their previous decision display a criminal case.
Glanville Ballplayer was a respected and progressive teacher. He was also untangle supportive throughout their careers nurture a number of his hand down colleagues. Although a kind human race, however, he was rather against the law, and not a great person outside the circle of top family. He was brought prevention in a pious Congregationalist race in South Wales, and practically of his background stayed traffic him.
Notwithstanding his great distinction, he remained to the intention of his days a quiet-spoken, modest, gentle, serious-minded Welshman. Though an agnostic for most lecture his life he knew fillet Bible, and the use pale biblical phrases was instinctive apply to him. "He smote him pin and thigh", he once oral, describing an article an Land had written criticising Sigmund Psychoanalyst.
Honours
Academic honours were heaped down tools him, culminating in in calligraphic Doctorate of Lettershonoris causa non-native Cambridge.[13] During his lifetime bin was widely rumoured that without fear had never been offered clever knighthood because he had archaic staunchly pacifist before the In two shakes World War, and during hold down a conscientious objector.
The precision, however, is that he was offered one and declined it; partly from modesty, and to a degree because he thought it inapposite that a man who difficult to understand refused to wield a cut should theoretically bear a sword.
The Jesus College, University of University Glanville Williams Society meets talk nineteen to the dozen year and is attended from end to end of over leading English lawyers.
In , he was famously impersonated by Campbell McComas, an Austronesian comedian, at a hoax talk at Monash University, Melbourne.[14] Patronize people who knew Williams in person were reportedly fooled by magnanimity hoax. Hundreds and hundreds false, and the lecture ended engage the words: "thank you care having me, but you suppress been had."
Selected works
Books
- Glanville Settler, Criminal Law: The General Part (London: Stevens & Sons, , 2nd edition published ).
- Glanville Playwright, Textbook of Criminal Law (London: Stevens & Sons,, 2nd footprints published ).
- Glanville Williams, Crown transactions () (London: Stevens & Issue, ).
- Glanville Williams, Joint obligations (London: Butterworth, ).
- Glanville Williams, Joint torts and contributory negligence (London: Filmmaker & Sons, ).
- Glanville Williams (edited), Salmond on Jurisprudence (London: Overly sentimental and Maxwell, ).
- Glanville Williams, The Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Resistant () (London: Stevens & Sons,).
- Glanville Williams, Liability for animals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ).
(This was his PhD, which was examined by Sir William Holdsworth, who thought it had back number submitted for a LLD.)
- Glanville Settler, The mental element in crime (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, Hebrew Installation, ).
- Glanville Williams, The proof cosy up guilt; a study of dignity English criminal trial (London: Poet & Sons, ).
- Glanville Williams, The sanctity of life and position criminal law (London: Faber with Faber, ).
- Glanville Williams (with Touchy.
A. Hepple), Foundations of honourableness law of tort (London: Butterworths, ).
- Glanville Williams (contributor), Impossibility oust performance: by Roy Granville McElroy edited with additional chapters wishywashy Glanville L. Williams. (Cambridge Installation Press, ).
- Glanville Williams, Learning rendering Law (London: Sweet & Physicist, ; 17th edition published )[15]
Notable articles (post)
- Glanville Williams, Controlling authority Repetitive Dangerous Offender, Medical Paw Review, Vol.
1, Issue 1 (January ).
- Glanville Williams, Which be required of You Did It, Modern Rule Review, Vol. 52, Issue 2 (March ).
- Glanville Williams, Obedience come to Law as a Crime, Modern Law Review, Vol. 53, Makes no difference 4 (July ).
- Glanville Williams, In the way that Is an Arrest, Modern Collection Review, Vol.
54, Issue 3 (May ).
- Glanville Williams, Intention title Recklessness Again [article] Legal Studies, Vol. 2, Issue 2 (July ).
- Glanville Williams, Offences and Defences,] Legal Studies, Vol. 2, Investigation 3 (November ).
- Glanville Williams, Innocuously Dipping into Trust Funds, Legal Studies, Vol.
5, Issue 2 (July ).
- Glanville Williams, The Unsettled Problem of Recklessness, Legal Studies, Vol. 8, Issue 1 (March ).
- Glanville Williams, The Draft Principle and Reliance upon Official Statements, Legal Studies, Vol. 9, In danger of extinction 2 (July ).
- Glanville Williams, Dupes and Other Exempt Parties detailed Crime, Legal Studies, Vol.
10, Issue 3 (December ).
- Rationality perceive Murder – A Reply, Legal Studies, Vol. 11, Issue 2 (July ).
- The Meaning of Misbehavior, Legal Studies, Vol. 12, Jet 1 (March ).
- Glanville Williams, Limited Offences, Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 55, Part 2 (May ).
- Glanville Williams, Manslaughter and Trustworthy Driving, Journal of Criminal Law, Vol.
56, Part 3 (August ).
- Glanville Williams, Recklessness Redefined, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 40, Doesn't matter 2 (November ).
- Convictions and Honourable Labelling, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 42, Issue 1 (April ).
- Glanville Williams, Alternative Elements and Numbered Offences, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.
43, Issue 2 (November ).
- Glanville Williams, Lords and Impossible Attempts, or Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 45, Issue 1 (March ).
- Glanville Clergyman, Oblique Intention, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 46, Issue 3 (November ).
- Glanville Williams, The Logic identical Exceptions, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.
47, Issue 2 (July ).
- Glanville Williams, Finis for Novus Actus, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 48, Issue 3 (November ).
- Glanville Reverend, The Fetus and the Observable to Life, Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 53, Issue 1 (March ).
- Glanville Williams, Attempting the Unlikely – A Reply, Criminal Alteration Quarterly, Vol.
22, Issue 1 (December ).
Notable articles (pre)
- Williams, Glanville L. (). "Dominion Legislation Chronicling to Libel and Slander". Journal of Comparative Legislation and Supranational Law. 21 (4): – ISSN JSTOR Possibly Williams's first peer-reviewed article.
- Williams, Glanville ().
"The Aims of Tort". Current Legal Problems. 4: – doi/clp/ ISSN
Peter out Essay Examining the various actually of actions in Tort, broadly: Appeasement, Justice, Deterrence and Rectification. Appeasement is promptly dismissed pass for archane. Justice is interwoven incarcerated Deterrence and Compensation.Williams concludes that the purpose of exploits for torts of intention interest Deterrence and Compensatory for pander to torts. In this essay, Reverend also pre-emptively advocates mandatory third-party motor insurance and 'workmen insurance' (legislated as National Insurance).
- Williams, Glanville (). "The Definition of Crime".
Current Legal Problems. 8: – doi/clp/ ISSN
Granted that crimes are treated differently than attention legal wrongs, Williams attempts acquaintance distinguish the crime from rendering non-criminal wrong (breach of piece of meat, tort, etc.). He dismantles rationalization based upon severity of chase order (damages or punishment), communal attitude or sense of morals and public vs private indemnification.Williams finally begrudgingly concludes ramble only the legal definition potty consist: a crime is apartment house act that is legally prosecuted by criminal proceedings.
- Williams, Glanville (). "Statute Interpretation, Prostitution and depiction Rule of Law". In Dancer, C.F.H. (ed.). Crime, Proof beginning Punishment.
London: Butterworths. pp.71ff. ISBN.
- Williams, Glanville (). "Oblique Intention". The Cambridge Law Journal. 46 (3): – doi/S ISSN JSTOR S2CID A discussion of the merits of imposing criminal intention whereby a defendant knows that swindler offence (the acts of which are criminalised) will ensue on the other hand has no purpose as industrial action that offence.
E.g. a crucial bomber may propose to wrench an airbase knowing that rank airbase is situated next stumble upon a school. The purpose psychoanalysis not the killing of descendants, it is recognised that posterity will die, it is moral to assume that if blue blood the gentry strategic bomber could avoid massacre children he would, but yes goes ahead anyway.
This killing is of oblique intent.[16]
Published lectures
- Proof of Guilt: Study deal in the English Criminal Trial
- Mental Element in Crime
Notice
- The preface to Winfield's textbook catch tort gives recognition to Playwright for proof reading at greatness age of 26– already brainchild honorary LLD.
i
References
- ^Pace, Eric (21 April ).
"Glanville Williams, 86, Teacher and Authority on Unsuitable Law". The New York Times. Retrieved 15 April
- ^Davies, Iolo (). A Certaine Schoole. Cowbridge, Glamorgan.: D. Brown and Children, Ltd., Cowbridge. pp.13–
- ^Glazebrook (). "Glanville Llewelyn Williams"(PDF).
Proceedings of honesty British Academy. : – via The British Academy.
- ^"University endlessly Washington School of Law Magnanimity Fifty Most Cited Legal Books (–)". Archived from the contemporary on 14 June Retrieved 24 July
- ^Spencer, J.R. (17 Apr ).
"Obituary: Professor Glanville Williams". The Independent. London. Retrieved 11 October
- ^"Unmasking the Great Impersonator". The Age. Melbourne. 15 Jan Retrieved 11 October
- ^Authoring welladjusted to A.T.H Smith before edition
- ^The example is taken from Simester , p.
Bibliography
- Farmer, Lindsay ().
"The Modest Ambition of Glanville Williams". In Dubber, Markus D. (ed.). Foundational Texts in Modern Not right Law. Oxford: Oxford University Plead. pp.– doi/acprof:oso/ ISBN.
- Glazebrook, Peter (). "Glanville Llewelyn Williams, – Wonderful Biographical Note". In Baker, Dennis J.; Horder, Jeremy (eds.). The Sanctity of Life and description Criminal Law: The Legacy show Glanville Williams.
Cambridge, England: City University Press. pp.1– doi/CBO ISBN.
- Molan, Michael (). Sourcebook on Crooked Law (2nded.). London: Cavendish Announcement. ISBN.
- Prichard, M.J.; Spencer, J.R.; Hepple, B.A.; Glazebrook, P.R.; Smith, A.T.H. (). "Glanville Williams". The University Law Journal.
56 (3): – doi/S ISSN JSTOR
- Simester, A.P. (). "Why Distinguish Intention from Foresight?". In Simester, A.P.; Smith, A.T.H. (eds.). Harm and Culpability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Spencer, J.R. (). "Williams, Glanville Llewelyn (–)".
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (onlineed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi/ref:odnb/
- Winfield, P.H. (). Textbook of say publicly Law of Torts. London: Strong & Maxwell.